First, my daughter Tania's artwork is featured on Still Life 365 today!
Now down to business. Today I finally got the clinic notes from the perinatology consult I had earlier this month. To my surprise the blood tests actually yielded some interesting results, however this does little to clarify why my pregnancy history is so tragic or whether there's any hope for the future. I'll spare you the life-threateningly boring science lesson about clotting disorders and just link to the heavy scientific explanations. If you want to make your head explode, go ahead and try to understand this stuff. Here are the results from my perinatology consult:
ANA (antinuclear antibody) – Positive 1:40 with speckled pattern
Apparently this is a low positive, so there's absolutely nothing definitive about it. Just another positive result that makes doctors go "hmm", but not "AHA, now we know what's wrong with you".
Beta 2 Glycoprotein 1 -
IgA: 69.46 U/mL
IgM: 4.84 U/mL
IgG: 3.72 U/mL
Note from Mayo Clinic Lab for IgA, IgM, and IgG interpretation:
10.0 U/mL or less = negative
10.0 – 14.9 U/mL = borderline
Greater than 15 U/mL = positive
If IgM or IgG is positive, the diagnosis would be antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (a.k.a. Hughes Syndrome, which is certainly easier to say). Only my IgA is very elevated and (surprise!) there is not adequate research to indicate what this means. Again - "HMM" a little louder this time, but NOT "AHA!!".
In 2007 just after my first loss I tested positive for Anti-cardiolipin antibodies. Results from testing immediately after delivery showed a "Moderate Positive" for IgG, followed by retesting the following month which showed an "Inconclusive" level. Tests for IgM were negative. Positive IgM levels indicate a problem. Positive IgG levels - well, no one's really sure exactly what that means. Hmm - not AHA. Are you seeing a pattern here?
Subsequent Anticardiolipin testing has been completely negative both after losing Miles (July 2007) and now (September 2010). As if things needed to be any more unclear, results on all of these tests are transient - you can test positive and then test again later and be negative. Or vice versa.
Additionally, I am heterozygous for MTHFT mutation C677T. This means I have one copy of the gene. The significance of this, as you may have guessed, is unclear. Hmmm. If I were homozygous (two copies of the gene) then it would be clinically significant.
So those are all the answers I've gotten from 40+ vials of blood, not to mention buckets of tears. I never expected any definitive answers about my horrible pregnancies from the perinatologist. Indeed, I'm convinced that there's not a single person anywhere in the world who can give me solid answers. Still, it's depressing to hear yet again that there is no certain explanation for my losses and no clear way to prevent it from happening again (other than remaining Super Infertile!).
I've been reading more about Hughes Syndrome and I do fit a lot of the descriptions. This post is getting pretty long, though, so we'll get into that later. Sorry to keep you on the edge of your seat! Seriously though, this blog is meant for the poor souls who will inevitably follow in my unlucky footsteps so we have to get into boring clinical stuff from time to time.
Now down to business. Today I finally got the clinic notes from the perinatology consult I had earlier this month. To my surprise the blood tests actually yielded some interesting results, however this does little to clarify why my pregnancy history is so tragic or whether there's any hope for the future. I'll spare you the life-threateningly boring science lesson about clotting disorders and just link to the heavy scientific explanations. If you want to make your head explode, go ahead and try to understand this stuff. Here are the results from my perinatology consult:
ANA (antinuclear antibody) – Positive 1:40 with speckled pattern
Apparently this is a low positive, so there's absolutely nothing definitive about it. Just another positive result that makes doctors go "hmm", but not "AHA, now we know what's wrong with you".
Beta 2 Glycoprotein 1 -
IgA: 69.46 U/mL
IgM: 4.84 U/mL
IgG: 3.72 U/mL
Note from Mayo Clinic Lab for IgA, IgM, and IgG interpretation:
10.0 U/mL or less = negative
10.0 – 14.9 U/mL = borderline
Greater than 15 U/mL = positive
If IgM or IgG is positive, the diagnosis would be antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (a.k.a. Hughes Syndrome, which is certainly easier to say). Only my IgA is very elevated and (surprise!) there is not adequate research to indicate what this means. Again - "HMM" a little louder this time, but NOT "AHA!!".
In 2007 just after my first loss I tested positive for Anti-cardiolipin antibodies. Results from testing immediately after delivery showed a "Moderate Positive" for IgG, followed by retesting the following month which showed an "Inconclusive" level. Tests for IgM were negative. Positive IgM levels indicate a problem. Positive IgG levels - well, no one's really sure exactly what that means. Hmm - not AHA. Are you seeing a pattern here?
Subsequent Anticardiolipin testing has been completely negative both after losing Miles (July 2007) and now (September 2010). As if things needed to be any more unclear, results on all of these tests are transient - you can test positive and then test again later and be negative. Or vice versa.
Additionally, I am heterozygous for MTHFT mutation C677T. This means I have one copy of the gene. The significance of this, as you may have guessed, is unclear. Hmmm. If I were homozygous (two copies of the gene) then it would be clinically significant.
So those are all the answers I've gotten from 40+ vials of blood, not to mention buckets of tears. I never expected any definitive answers about my horrible pregnancies from the perinatologist. Indeed, I'm convinced that there's not a single person anywhere in the world who can give me solid answers. Still, it's depressing to hear yet again that there is no certain explanation for my losses and no clear way to prevent it from happening again (other than remaining Super Infertile!).
I've been reading more about Hughes Syndrome and I do fit a lot of the descriptions. This post is getting pretty long, though, so we'll get into that later. Sorry to keep you on the edge of your seat! Seriously though, this blog is meant for the poor souls who will inevitably follow in my unlucky footsteps so we have to get into boring clinical stuff from time to time.